1) Unsafe, indiscriminate sex. 2) For health reasons, yes. 3) Yup. 4) Huh... *thinks hard* Not really. If it did, the term would only be applied to women. 5) quantitative. 6) Nope. *thinks really hard* Ooo, the folks I would have called promiscuous at one time, no longer are. They finally wised up (and oddly enough, all were men). 7) It does create some level of intimacy for me. 8) Yes, some people can have sex without intimacy. For me though, only if I'm having it with myself. 9) Yes. Yes I believe you can. 10) In my eyes, no. I know that's not the case with most folks though.
You made me have to do lots of thinking before noon and only with two cups of coffee :p For that, you get Hortense.
no subject
2) For health reasons, yes.
3) Yup.
4) Huh... *thinks hard* Not really. If it did, the term would only be applied to women.
5) quantitative.
6) Nope. *thinks really hard* Ooo, the folks I would have called promiscuous at one time, no longer are. They finally wised up (and oddly enough, all were men).
7) It does create some level of intimacy for me.
8) Yes, some people can have sex without intimacy. For me though, only if I'm having it with myself.
9) Yes. Yes I believe you can.
10) In my eyes, no. I know that's not the case with most folks though.
You made me have to do lots of thinking before noon and only with two cups of coffee :p For that, you get Hortense.